Earmarking / Earmarks / Miscellaneous Tariff Bills
photo credit: Beau B
Earmarking: Either of the following:
(1) Dedicating collections by law for a specific purpose or program. Earmarked collections include trust fund receipts, special fund receipts, intragovernmental receipts, and offsetting collections credited to appropriation accounts. These collections may be classified as budget receipts, proprietary receipts, or reimbursements to appropriations.
(2) Designating any portion of a lump-sum amount for particular purposes by means of legislative language. Sometimes, “earmarking” is colloquially used to characterize directions included in congressional committee reports but not in the legislation itself, i.e., “directed congressional appropriations.”
Earmark Point of Order
Also called “pork” and “bringing home the bacon“. (See also Crony Capitalism / Rent-Seeking / Corporate Welfare / Revolving Door (CongressionalGlossary.com).)
Miscellaneous Tariff Bills: The Committee on Ways and Means in the House of Representatives has initial jurisdiction over legislation to amend the U.S. tariff schedule and to make corrections to trade legislation. Miscellaneous tariff bills (MTBs) request the temporary reduction or suspension of duties on certain U.S. imports or request other technical corrections to the U.S. Harmonized Tariff System.
The primary purpose of such bills is to help U.S. manufacturers compete at home and abroad by temporarily suspending or reducing duties on intermediate products or materials that are not made domestically, or where there is no domestic opposition. Such reductions or suspensions reduce costs for U.S. businesses and ultimately increase the competitiveness of their products.
The Committee on Ways and Means issues a public notice inviting Members of Congress to introduce bills by a set deadline. After collecting and reviewing bills introduced by this deadline, the Subcommittee on Trade issues an advisory requesting public comment on the bills. In addition, the Subcommittee requests a review and analysis of each bill from the Department of Commerce, U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and the International Trade Commission (ITC). USTR reviews each bill for trade policy considerations.
As a general rule, MTB requests should be “non-controversial,” meaning there should be no domestic production of a competing product (or opposition from domestic U.S. producers) and a bill should not operate retroactively or create excess revenue losses. The Committee can weigh other factors on a case-by-case basis as can the administration during its review.
Once the House passes a final package of MTBs, it enters the Senate and is referred to the Finance Committee. When the package passes the Senate and differences are worked out between the both legislative chambers, a final bill then goes to the President for signature.
Source: Office of the United States Trade Representative
Rep. Doggett Continuing Work to Make All Levels of Government More Accessible
The House Ways and Means Committee on Thursday [May 22, 2012] published a list of approximately 1,300 proposed limited tariff bills under consideration for inclusion in legislation that Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.) is pushing.
But the vast majority of the proposals benefit 10 or fewer companies, making them banned “earmarks” under House rules, according to an analysis by Heritage Action for America.
The conservative group found that only 16 of the 1,300 proposals help more than 10 entities.
“Study: Most Tariff Bills Would Count as ‘Earmarks’,” by Jonathan Strong, Roll Call, May 25, 2012
- Miscellaneous Tariff Bills (MTBs) in the 112th Congress House MTB Process – House Ways and Means Committee listing
- USITC Congressional Bill Reports – “a listing, by each session of Congress, of the miscellaneous tariff bills for which the Commission approved a formal memorandum to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House or the Committee on Finance of the Senate. The reports contain information on the company responsible for the bill’s introduction, projected level of imports, estimates of revenue loss and available information on possible U.S. production.” From the US International Trade Commission
- “limited tariff disclosure form” – Google search
Hearing on the Miscellaneous Tariff Bill: Helping U.S. Manufacturers through Tax Cuts
- Special Fund Accounts under Federal Fund Accounts (CongressionalGlossary.com)
- Trust Fund Accounts (CongressionalGlossary.com)
- Offsetting Collections under Collections (CongressionalGlossary.com)
- Proprietary Receipts from the Public under Collections (CongressionalGlossary.com)
- Committee Allocation (CongressionalGlossary.com)
- § 7.81, Limitations, Earmarks, and General Provisions, in Congressional Deskbook
- Chapter 7.K., Earmarks, in Congressional Procedure
Earmarks, pork barrel projects and logrolling
- Crony Capitalism / Rent-Seeking / Corporate Welfare / Revolving Door (CongressionalGlossary.com)
- “Once-routine tariff bills now troublesome for Congress,” by James Rosen, The Miami Herald, May 20, 2012
- “Earmarks still have friends in high places,” by Jonathan Allen, Politico, May 15, 2012
- “Misguided Misgivings about the Miscellaneous Tariff Bill,” by Daniel Ikenson, Cato, May 8, 2012
- “Earmarks to Return if GOP Porkers Get Their Way,” by Drew Johnson, Breitbart, April 8, 2012
- “Senatorial Tragedy: ‘Without congressional earmarks, we find ourselves at the mercy of the bureaucrats…’,” by Nick Gillespie, Hit & Run, April 3, 2012
- “Baucus Announces Process for Miscellaneous Tariff Bill,” Senate Committee on Finance, March 30, 2012 (5-page PDF)
- Manufacturing Tariff Bill Coalition – “MTB Coalition for short, brings together many large and small users of the Miscellaneous Tariff Bill (MTB) process. Management of the MTB Coalition is provided by IBC, which for over 25 years has provided leadership on MTB issues, advocating for passage of duty suspension legislation, and keeping members of our Coalition informed of and involved in all developments related to the duty suspension process.”
- Select Committee on Earmark Reform – Govtrack; H.Con.Res.201 – To establish the Joint Select Committee on Earmark Reform, and for other purposes. – Congress.gov
- Earmarks, Earmarks, Earmarks!
- Earmarks – OpenSecrets
- Congressional Pig Book – Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW)
- “Banning Earmarks Effective or Mostly for Show?” Hobnob Blog, November 22, 2010
- Pork barrel ( i.e., “pork”) – Wikipedia
- Earmark – Wikipedia
- Porkbusters – Wikipedia
- “Tariff Modifications: Miscellaneous Tariff Bills,” CRS Report RL33867 (2012) (22-page PDF)
- “Miscellaneous Tariff Bills: Overview and Issues for Congress,” CRS Report RL33867 (2015) (20-page PDF)
- “Trade Promotion Authority (TPA): Frequently Asked Questions,” CRS Report R43491 (42-page PDF)
- Earmark Disclosure Rules in the House: Member and Committee Requirements, CRS Report RS22866 (9-page PDF)
- “Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties,” CRS Report 97-896 (13-page PDF)
- “Generalized System of Preferences: Background and Renewal Debate,” CRS Report RL33663 (46-page PDF)
- “Lifting the Earmark Moratorium: Frequently Asked Questions,” CRS Report R45429 (12-page PDF)
- “Earmark Disclosure Rules in the Senate: Member and Committee Requirements,” CRS Report RS22867 (11-page PDF)
- “Earmarks: The one thing Trump gets right about Congress,” January 17, 2018, Brookings
- “Federal Spending Is Out of Control. No, Earmarks Won’t Change That.” Veronique de Rugy, Reason, March 4, 2021
- “House Committees Release Guidance for Transportation Earmarks,” CRS Insight IN11647 (6-page PDF)
- “Section 307 and Imports Produced by Forced Labor,” CRS In Focus IF11360 (5-page PDF)
Senators Toomey and Corker ask for unanimous consent on their 232 amendment
- Congressional Operations Briefing – Capitol Hill Workshop
- Drafting Federal Legislation and Amendments
- Writing for Government and Business: Critical Thinking and Writing
- Custom Training
- Congressional Operations Poster, with Federal Budget Process Flowchart
- Federal Budgeting, a Five-Course series on CD
- Congress, the Legislative Process, and the Fundamentals of Lawmaking Series, a Nine-Course series on CD
The Federal Budget Process 2E
Citizen’s Handbook to Influencing Elected Officials: A Guide for Citizen Lobbyists and Grassroots Advocates
CongressionalGlossary.com, from TheCapitol.Net
For more than 40 years, TheCapitol.Net and its predecessor, Congressional Quarterly Executive Conferences, have been teaching professionals from government, military, business, and NGOs about the dynamics and operations of the legislative and executive branches and how to work with them.
Our custom on-site and online training, publications, and audio courses include congressional operations, legislative and budget process, communication and advocacy, media and public relations, testifying before Congress, research skills, legislative drafting, critical thinking and writing, and more.
TheCapitol.Net is on the GSA Schedule, MAS, for custom on-site and online training. GSA Contract GS02F0192X
TheCapitol.Net is a non-partisan small business.
Teaching how Washington and Congress work ™